Gait and strength assessment following surgical repair by intramedullary nailing of isolated tibial shaft fracture.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the long-term strength and gait outcomes after intramedullary nailing of isolated tibial diaphyseal fractures. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic Level I trauma center. Fifteen participants with isolated tibial diaphyseal fractures (OTA/AO 42) at least 2 years postoperative from intramedullary nailing (IMN) provided informed consent. The average age was 40 ± 14 (range, 24-69); there were nine men and six women. Knee flexion-extension strength data were collected. Temporal-spatial, kinematic, and kinetic gait parameters were measured and compared to historic control data. Participants completed the SF-36 and shortened musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaires. The mean length of follow-up between surgery and gait analysis was 6 ± 2 years. The fractured limb demonstrated deficits in quadriceps strength between 9.8% and 23.4% compared to the unaffected limb. Temporal-spatial parameters revealed slower walking speed, shorter stride length, decreased cadence, and shorter single-limb support time in the fractured limb. Altered kinematic and kinetic findings included a knee extension shift during stance, with an increased knee flexor moment demand and decreased total knee power during loading and midstance. These findings represent deficits in concentric and eccentric knee extensor activity. Additionally, the fractured limb demonstrated decreased ankle dorsiflexion during stance and diminished ankle push-off power. Long-term outcomes after IMN of tibial diaphyseal fractures demonstrate decreased quadriceps strength and altered gait parameters that may have implications to the high incidence of knee and ankle pain in the fractured limb.

The increasing complexity of femoral fragility fractures: incidence, fracture patterns and management over a 10-year period.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there have been changes in the numbers and complexity of femoral fragility fractures presenting to our department over a period of 10 years. METHODS: Patients >60 years presenting with femoral fragility fractures to our institution in 2018-2019 (397 fractures) were compared with respect to demographic data, incidence rates, fracture classification and surgical management with a historical cohort from 2009-2010 (335 fractures). Pathological and high velocity fractures were excluded. RESULTS: The gender proportion and average age (83.1 vs. 82.7 years) was unchanged. The number of femoral fractures increased by 19% but the overall incidence in people >60 years fell by 6% (p = 0.41). The proportion of unstable trochanteric fractures (31A2 and A3) increased from 22% to 55% (p < 0.001). The proportion of displaced intracapsular fractures increased from 53% to 72% (p < 0.001). The incidence of stable trochanteric fractures fell from 12.4 to 7.3/10,000 patients>60 years (p = 0.0006) while the incidence of unstable trochanteric fractures (31A2 and 31A3) increased from 3.5 to 8.9/10,000 patients >60 years (p < 0.0001). The proportion of trochanteric fractures treated with an intramedullary (IM) nail increased from 9% to 35% (p = 0.0001). The number of shaft and distal femoral fractures increased by 41% although the incidence did not change significantly. Periprosthetic fractures comprised 70% of femoral shaft fractures in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing number and complexity of femoral fragility fractures, especially unstable trochanteric fractures and periprosthetic fractures, is likely to have an impact on implant use, theatre time and cost.

Epidemiology and treatment of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population.

Proximal femoral fractures are a serious complication, especially for elderly patients. Detailed epidemiological analyzes provide a valuable resource for stakeholders in the health care system in order to foresee future development possibly influenceable by adaption of therapeutic procedures and prevention strategies. This work aimed at answering the following research questions: (1) What are the incidence rates of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population? (2) What is the preferred treatment procedure for these fractures? Proximal femoral fractures occurred between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2019 in patients ≥ 65 years were identified from the Medicare Physician Service Records Data Base. The 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, equivalent to the records from approximately 2.5 million enrollees formed the basis of this study. Fractures were grouped into head/neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures. The overall incidence rate, age and sex specific incidence rates as well as incidence rate ratios were calculated. Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify procedures and operations. In 2019, a total number of 7982 femoral head/neck fractures was recorded. In comparison to 9588 cases in 2009, the incidence substantially decreased by 26.6% from 666.7/100,000 inhabitants to 489.3/100,000 inhabitants (z = - 5.197, p < 0.001). Also, in intertrochanteric fractures, a significant decline in the incidence by 17.3% was evident over the years from 367.7/100,000 inhabitants in 2009 to 304.0 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2019 (z = - 2.454, p = 0.014). A similar picture was observable for subtrochanteric fractures, which decreased by 29.6% (51.0 cases per 100,000 to 35.9 cases per 100,000) over the time period (z = - 1.612, p = 0.107). Head/neck fractures were mainly treated with an arthroplasty (n = 36,301, 40.0%). The majority of intertrochanteric fractures and subtrochanteric fractures received treatment with an intramedullary device (n = 34,630, 65.5% and n = 5870, 77.1%, respectively). The analysis indicated that the incidence of all types of proximal femoral neck fractures decreased for the population of elderly patients in the U.S. within the last decade. Treatment of head and neck fractures was mainly conducted through arthroplasty, while intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures predominantly received an intramedullary nailing.

Eficacia y seguridad del clavo intramedular trocantérico con sistema antirrotatorio para pacientes adultos mayores con fracturas trocantéricas inestables / Efficacy and safety of trochanteric intramedullary nail with antirotation system for older adult patients with unstable trochanteric fractures

ANTECEDENTES En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021, y ampliada con Resolución N°97-IETSIESSALUD-2022, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen, el cual expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad del clavo intramedular trocantérico con mecanismo antirrotatorio (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, PFNA, por sus siglas en inglés) para pacientes adultos mayores con fracturas trocantéricas inestables. De este modo, el Dr. Daniel Cauti De la Cruz, médico traumatólogo del servicio de fracturas y osteosíntesis del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM), siguiendo la Directiva N° 001- IETSI-ESSALUD-2018, envió al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) la solicitud de inclusión del dispositivo médico "clavo intramedular trocantérico canulado con hoja espinal angulaciones con cementación". ASPECTOS GENERALES: Las fracturas trocantéricas, también conocidas como fracturas proximales del fémur, representan una creciente preocupación de salud pública en la población adulta mayor, principalmente debido a la vulnerabilidad del hueso envejecido a lesiones menores o de baja energía (Court-Brown & McQueen, 2016). Se estima que, en el 2050, más de 6.3 millones de estas fracturas ocurrirán anualmente a nivel mundial (Gullberg et al., 1997). Además, estas fracturas están asociadas con altos índices de morbilidad y mortalidad. Según la OMS, la mortalidad al año después de una fractura de cadera en adultos mayores es de hasta el 30 % (World Health Organization, s/f). Las tendencias demográficas actuales, que indican un rápido envejecimiento de la población global, anticipan una creciente carga de morbilidad y mortalidad asociada a estas fracturas en las próximas décadas (United Nations, 2019). En la actualidad, el manejo de las fracturas trocantéricas inestables en adultos mayores se realiza mediante estrategias que intentan favorecer la movilización temprana y disminuir las complicaciones postoperatorias (Fischer et al., 2021). El sistema de placa con tornillo dinámico de cadera (DHS por sus siglas en inglés) es una opción comúnmente utilizada en este contexto. Con este dispositivo la placa se fija extramedularmente, mediante la colocación de tornillos a nivel del cuello femoral y del fémur (Parker, 1992). Aunque algunos estudios han reportado que el DHS puede ser efectivo en el manejo de las fracturas trocantéricas (Anglen & Weinstein, 2008; Bhandari et al., 2009), otros informes han identificado varias limitaciones con este dispositivo. Las complicaciones reportadas incluyen la falla de la fijación, pérdida de reducción y complicaciones relacionadas con la herida debido a la incisión significativa que se requiere para su colocación (Lindskog & Baumgaertner, 2004). Asimismo, el tornillo deslizante de compresión dinámica (Dynamic Compression Screw, DCS por sus siglas en inglés) es un dispositivo de fijación extramedular, similar al DHS, empleado en el tratamiento de las fracturas trocantéricas en adultos mayores. A diferencia del DHS, el DCS permite fijación rígida a la fractura y evita el deslizamiento del tornillo, lo que podría fomentar la compresión y cicatrización de la fractura porque mantiene los fragmentos de hueso firmemente unidos sin permitir su desplazamiento, lo cual podría favorecer la estabilidad en determinados tipos de fracturas (Müller et al., 1990). METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad del clavo intramedular trocantérico con mecanismo antirrotatorio para pacientes adultos mayores con fracturas trocantéricas inestables. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en las bases de datos Medline, Cochrane library, Web of Science3y LiLACS. Así mismo se realizó una búsqueda manual dentro de las páginas web pertenecientes a la Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC), la Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), The Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), la Comissáo Nacional de Incorporagáo de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC), el Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), el Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), la Hauté Autorité de Santé (HAS), la Unidad de Análisis y Generación de Evidencias en Salud Pública (UNAGESP), el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), el Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), el Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), el Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), el Instituto de Calidad y Eficiencia en la Atención de la Salud (IQWiG, por sus siglas en alemán), la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), el Ministerio de Salud del Perú (MINSA) y el IETSI, a fin de poder identificar guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y evaluaciones de tecnología sanitarias (ETS) de relevancia que pudiesen haber sido omitidas por la estrategia de búsqueda o que no hayan sido publicadas en las bases de datos consideradas. RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica hasta el 27 de junio del 2023 se incluyeron dos GPC (NICE, 2023; O'Connor & Switzer, 2022), una RS (Y. R. Zhang et al., 2019) y tres ECA (Huang et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2010a; Zehir et al., 2015) provenientes de las referencias de la RS. CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación no aprueba el uso del clavo intramedular trocantérico con mecanismo antirrotatorio para pacientes adultos mayores con fracturas trocantéricas inestables en comparación con las tecnologías disponibles en la institución.

Resource implications of managing paediatric femoral fractures in a major trauma centre: Analysis of 98 cases.

INTRODUCTION: The management of paediatric femoral shaft fractures is expensive and is guided by age and fracture characteristics. The primary aim of this study was to perform a cost evaluation for managing paediatric femoral shaft fractures. The secondary aim of this study was to perform and compare costs of the different techniques of managing paediatric femoral shaft fractures. METHODS: Ninety-eight femoral shaft fractures in children aged ≤16 were identified between 01/06/2014-30/06/2019. Retrospective data of clinical complications were obtained on infection, malunion and non-union. Data on additional intervention, reoperations for complications and routine removal of metal work were obtained. Costing analysis was performed by a bottom-up calculation, and gathering Patient Level Information and Costing System (PLICS) data. RESULTS: There were 41 hip spica casting (HSC), 21 flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN), 14 submuscular plating (SMP), 19 rigid intramedullary nailing (RIN) and 3 external fixation (EF). Complications observed were HSC 3(7%); FIN 8(38%); SMP 2(14%); RIN 1(5%); EF 2(67%). The total costs for managing femoral shaft fractures were £8,955pp the costs for the different managements were; HSC £3,442pp; FIN £7,739pp; SMP £6,953pp; RIN £8,925pp; EF £19,116pp. The additional costs incurred for managing complications and routine removal of metal work for the internal fixation methods were: HSC 0.7%, FIN 23.7%, SMP 16.3%, RIN 10.9%, EF 28.1%. CONCLUSION: The operative management of paediatric femoral shaft fractures is associated with a high cost burden and this study demonstrates how financial data can be used to influence clinical management strategy. RIN carry a high initial implant cost however when considering the additional costs, such as treating complications it remains comparable to other modes of fixation. Our cost analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between FIN, SMP and RIN. Due to the clinical complications observed and associated additional costs, we have discontinued the routine use of FIN for femoral shaft fractures at our centre. We recognise other centres may have a different complication and cost profile for each technique, but recommend they evaluate their practice given the potential economic benefit it has on the service provider.

Fellowship-Trained Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Achieve Better Postoperative Radiographic Parameters After Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures when Compared With Non-trauma-Trained Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are common orthopaedic injuries accounting for nearly 30% of all fracture-related hospitalizations. Because many factors predictive of failure are related to technical aspects of the surgery, the purpose of this study was to compare radiographic parameters after fixation, comparing fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with surgeons who did not complete an orthopaedic trauma fellowship. METHODS: We initiated a search for CPT code 27245 across our hospital network to identify 100 consecutive patients treated by five fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists and 100 consecutive patients treated by community surgeons. Patients were then stratified based on their surgeon's subspecialty training (trauma vs community). Primary outcome variables were neck-shaft angle (NSA), a comparison of the repaired NSA with the uninjured side, tip-apex distance, and reduction quality. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in each group. The mean age in the community group was 77 years compared with 79 years in the trauma group. The mean tip-apex distance for the trauma group was 10 mm compared with 21 mm for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean postoperative NSA for the trauma group was 133° compared with 127° for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean difference of the NSA of the repaired side compared with the uninjured side was 2.5° of valgus in the trauma group compared with 5° of varus for the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 93 good reductions in the trauma group compared with 19 in the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 0 poor reductions in the trauma group and 49 in the community group ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Overall, we have shown that fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons achieve better reductions when treating intertrochanteric femur fractures with intramedullary nails. Orthopaedic residency training should emphasize teaching proper techniques and acceptable parameters for reduction and implant placement when treating geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Femoral shaft fractures in eldery patients - An epidemiological risk analysis of incidence, mortality and complications.

OBJECTIVES: This work aimed at answering the following research questions: (1) What is the incidence of femoral shaft fractures in the geriatric population in the U.S.? (2) What is the rate of mortality, mechanical complications, nonunion and infection, and what are the associated risk factors? STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In this cross-sectional study, femoral shaft fractures occurred between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019, were identified from Medicare records. Rates of mortality, nonunion, infection, and mechanical complications were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method with Fine and Gray sub-distribution adaptation. Semiparametric Cox regression was applied with twenty-three covariates to determine risk factors. RESULTS: Between 2009 through 2019 the incidence of femoral shaft fractures decreased by 12.07% to 40.8/100,000 inhabitants (p = 0.549). The 5-year mortality risk was 58.5%. Male sex, age over 75 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, tobacco dependence, and lower median household income were significant risk factors. The infection rate was 2.22% [95%CI: 1.90-2.58] and the union failure rate 2.52% [95%CI: 2.17-2.92] after 24 months. CONCLUSION: An early assessment of individual patient risk factors may be beneficial in the care and treatment of patients with these fractures.

Assessment of fracture healing in orthopaedic trauma.

Fracture healing is a complex physiologic process, relying on the crucial interplay between biological and mechanical factors. It is generally assessed using imaging modalities, including conventional radiology, CT, MRI and ultrasound (US), based on the fracture and patient features. Although these techniques are routinely used in orthopaedic clinical practice, unfortunately, they do not provide any information about the biomechanical status of the fracture site. Therefore, in recent years, several non-invasive techniques have been proposed to assess bone healing using ultrasonic wave propagation, changes in electrical properties of bones and callus stiffness measurement. Moreover, different research groups are currently developing smart orthopaedic implants (plates, intramedullary nails and external fixators), able to provide information about the fracture healing process. These devices could significantly improve orthopaedic and trauma clinical practice in the future and, at the same time, reduce patients' exposure to X-rays. This study aims to define the role of traditional imaging techniques and emerging technologies in the assessment of the fracture healing process.

Mortality and morbidity following operative management of tibial shaft fractures in octogenarians.

PURPOSE: As the geriatric population continues to grow, the incidence of tibial shaft fractures in octogenarians is projected to increase. There is significant variation in the functional and physiologic status within the geriatric population. The purpose of this study is to compare the complications following operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures for patients who are 65- to79-year-old compared to patients who are 80- to 89-year-old. METHODS: Data were collected through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the years 2007-2018. All isolated tibial shaft fractures that were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or intramedullary nail (IMN) were identified. Patients were divided into a 65- to 79-year-old group and an 80-to 89-year-old group. Primary and secondary outcomes were studied and included 30-day mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with a significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 434 patients with tibial shaft fractures were included in the study. Of these, 333 were 65- to 79-year-old and 101 were 80- to 89-year-old (Table 1). On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in complication rates between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: After controlling for demographics and comorbidities, age was not independently associated with 30-day mortality or any other peri-operative complications between patients aged 80 to 89 and patients aged 65 to 79 following operative management of tibial shaft fractures. In appropriately selected octogenarian patients, operative management of tibial shaft fractures represents a relatively safe treatment modality that may promote early rehabilitation.

Cost Comparison of Kirschner Wire Versus Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary screw fixation is a relatively new technique for fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. The objective of this study was to compare health care-associated costs and outcomes for intramedullary screw versus Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation of hand fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing intramedullary screw fixation of hand fractures at a single center during 2016-2019 inclusive was conducted. Health care-associated costs were compared with age-matched and fracture pattern-matched controls who underwent K-wire fixation. RESULTS: Fifty patients met the study inclusion criteria, incorporating 62 fractures (29 K-wire, 33 intramedullary screw fixation). The median age was 34.6 years (18.0-90.1 years). There was no significant difference in primary operative costs (£1130.4 ± £162.7 for K-wire vs £1087.0 ± £104.2 for intramedullary screw), outpatient follow-up costs (£958.7 ± £149.4 for K-wire vs £782.4 ± £143.8 for intramedullary screw), or total health care-associated costs (£2089.1 ± £209.0 for K-wire vs £1869.4 ± £195.3 for intramedullary screw). However, follow-up costs were significantly lower for the uncomplicated intramedullary screw cohort (£847.1 ± £109.1 for K-wire vs £657.5 ± £130.8 for intramedullary screw, P = .05). Subgroup analysis also revealed that overall costs were significantly higher for buried K-wire techniques. Complication rates, time to return to active work, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified significantly lower outpatient follow-up costs for uncomplicated intramedullary screw fixation of hand fractures compared with K-wires, along with a trend toward lower overall health care-associated costs. In addition, buried K-wire techniques were also found to carry a significantly higher financial burden. Higher powered prospective studies are required to determine indirect costs.

Intramedullary Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Ankle fractures pose a unique challenge to the treating orthopedic surgeon. Intramedullary (IM) distal fibula fixation is a relatively newer entity offering a viable option to minimize wound complications while providing similar outcomes. Our study utilizes an IM nail featuring proximal fixation via IM talons ensuring maintenance of fracture reduction this is the largest case series utilizing this novel device assessing time to weight-bearing (WB) and fracture union in addition to the safety and reproducibility of percutaneous reduction. METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted on 51 ankle fractures treated with a single IM device for lateral malleolar fixation. Postoperative radiographs were assessed, qualifying reductions as good, fair, or poor based on a reduction classification. Patient charts were reviewed for fracture characteristics, reduction method, fracture union, time to WB, and complications. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 32.2 weeks; 47 fracture reductions (92%) were classified as good, and 4 (8%) were fair. All but 1 fracture (98%) went onto union. Average time to union was 10.3 weeks. Average time to WB with and without a walking boot was 6.8 and 11.2 weeks, respectively. Two patients experienced painful hardware. One patient had a superficial wound infection. CONCLUSION: When evaluating this novel IM device, fracture union and time to union were found to be acceptable, with minimal wound or other complications. Percutaneous reduction permitted good fracture reduction quality. Consistent time to WB for a variety of fractures was reliably demonstrated following operative fixation with this device, including those in the elderly population. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Clinical case series.

Assessment of Intraoperative Rotational Alignment of Closed Locked Intramedullary Nailing for Humerus Fractures.

Intramedullary nailing of humerus fractures has evolved over the past half century and has grown in popularity especially for the polytraumatized patient. The importance of restoring appropriate rotational alignment is equivalent to that of restoring sagittal and coronal alignment to decrease the risk of shoulder degenerative changes and limit range of motion discrepancy from the contralateral limb. This technique is designed to introduce an intraoperative fluoroscopic method to obtain adequate rotational alignment of humeral shaft fractures treated with closed antegrade humeral locked nailing.

Antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nail is cost-effective for the initial treatment of GAâ ¢ open tibia fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nails (IMN) in the initial management of Gustilo-Anderson type Ⅲ (GAIII) open tibia fractures. METHODS: A break-even equation was used to analyze the costs associated with antibiotic cement-coated IMN and postoperative infection following GAⅢ open tibia fractures. This equation produced a new infection rate, which defines what percentage the antibiotic coated IMN needs to decrease the initial infection rate for its prophylactic use to be cost-effective. The postoperative infection rate used for calculations was 30%, a value established in current literature for these fracture types (6-33%). The institutional costs associated with a single operative debridement and resultant inpatient stay and treatment were determined. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to demonstrate how various total costs of infection and different infection rates affected the break-even rate, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), and the number needed to treat (NNT). RESULTS: Financial review yielded an average institutional cost of treating a postoperative infection to be $13,282.85. This number was inclusive of all procedures during an inpatient stay. The added cost of the antibiotic coated implant to the hospital is $743.42. Utilizing the break-even formula with these costs and a 30% initial infection rate, antibiotic coated IMN was economically viable if it decreased infection rate by 0.056% (NNT = 1,785.714). CONCLUSION: This break-even analysis model suggests the initial use of an antibiotic coated IMN in the setting of GAⅢ open tibia fractures is cost-effective.

Dynamic hip screw versus intramedullary nailing for the treatment of A1 intertrochanteric fractures: A retrospective, comparative study and cost analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare sliding hip screw and intramedullary nail perioperative results and costs in two-part femoral fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 85 patients (70 males, 15 females; mean age: 85.6±9.5 years; range, 33 to 99 years) who were treated for intertrochanteric two-part femoral fractures were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were stratified and divided into two groups according to type of implant used for surgical fixation: one group treated with intramedullary proximal femoral nail (EBA) and the other with sliding hip screw (DHS). Comorbidity, hemoglobin (Hb) level, hematocrit (hct) level, number of transfusions, and days of hospitalization details were evaluated. Postoperative X-rays were analyzed to assess the quality of reduction and to identify non-union, malunion, mechanical failures, and heterotopic ossifications. The modified Harris Hip Score, fracture mobility score, and Parker Mobility Score were calculated. Cost analysis considered the orthopedic device, operating room, transfusion, and hospital costs for the primary hospital stay. RESULTS: Of the patients, 44 were treated with DHS and 41 were treated with EBA nail by a single surgeon. No significant differences were found in the baseline demographic data. There was a significant increased operative time (p<0.001) and decreased fluoroscopy X-ray exposure time (p=0.031) in the subgroup of patients who underwent DHS fixation. The patients who underwent EBA nail fixation had a significantly higher transfusion rate during hospitalization (p=0.001) and a significantly lower Hb level and hct level on postoperative Day 1 and Day 3 (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the clinical and functional scores, radiographic outcomes and mortality (p>0.05). The patients who underwent intramedullary nail fixation had higher costs. CONCLUSION: Sliding hip screws showed decreased postoperative anemization, lower transfusion rates, and similar clinical outcomes compared to the intramedullary nail for two-part femoral fractures. Sliding hip screws should be preferred for A1 intertrochanteric fractures.

Eficacia y seguridad del sistema de clavo intramedular retrógrado para artrodesis en pacientes adultos con fracturas complejas y/o deformidades de la articulación tibia-astrágalo-calcáneo / Efficacy and safety of the retrograde intramedullary nail system for arthrodesis in adult patients with complex fractures and/or deformities of the tibia-talar-calcaneus joint

ANTECEDENTES En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución del Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen preliminar sobre la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad del sistema de clavo intramedular retrógrado (CIR) para artrodesis en pacientes adultos con fracturas complejas y/o deformidades de la articulación tibia-astrágalo-calcáneo. Mediante la Nota N° 2761-GRPA-ESSALUD-2020, los médicos especialistas del Servicio II de Ortopedia del Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen (HNGAI), a través de la gerencia de su red prestacional, solicitan al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) la evaluación para incorporación del dispositivo "sistema de clavo intramedular retrógrado para artrodesis tibia-astrágalo-calcáneo". ASPECTOS GENERALES: Las patologías del tobillo' y retropié2, por lo general, pueden ser ocasionadas debido a traumatismo agudo o como secuela de alguna condición crónica (ógüt and Yontar 2017). Las fracturas y deformidades son dos de las condiciones patológicas que pueden ser identificadas con mayor frecuencia a este nivel. Se estima que aproximadamente un 70 % de las fracturas son unimaleolares3, 20 % bimaleolares4y un 10 % trimaleolares5 (Court-Brown, McBirnie, and Wilson 1998). Además, se reporta una tasa similar de fracturas según sexo; sin embargo, esto puede variar según diferentes grupos de edad (Daly et al. 1987). Por su parte, se reporta que algunas deformidades de tobillo, como la osteoartritis, están presentes en aproximadamente 13 millones de adultos mayores de 60 años en los Estados Unidos (Thomas et al. 2017). A nivel local, según información proporcionada por los especialistas del Servicio II de Ortopedia del HNGAI en los anexos de la solicitud, se presentan anualmente alrededor de 36 casos nuevos de pacientes que presentan fracturas complejas que involucran la tibia distal, el astrágalo y el calcáneo. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia y seguridad de la artrodesis con el sistema de CIR, en comparación con la artrodesis utilizando tornillos o fijación externa, en pacientes con fracturas complejas y/o deformidades de la articulación tibia-astrágalo-calcáneo. La búsqueda bibliográfica8se realizó en las bases de datos de PubMed, The Cochrane Library y LILACS. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda manual en Google y dentro de las páginas web pertenecientes a grupos que realizan guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS), incluyendo, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI), Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), The Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), Comissáo Nacional de IncorporaQáo de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC), Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Instituto de Calidad y Eficiencia en la Atención de la Salud (IQWiG, por sus siglas en alemán), y Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica con fecha 15 de febrero de 2022, se incluyeron para evaluación dos GPC orientadas al manejo de pacientes con fracturas del pie y tobillo: CENETEC e IMSS (Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud 2011, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social 2010); no se identificaron GPC orientadas al manejo de deformidades de la articulación tibia-astrágalo-calcáneo, o deformidades que involucran al pie, retropié y/o tobillo. Además, se incluyó un ECA (Georgiannos, Lampridis, and Bisbinas 2017) que evaluó la eficacia y seguridad del procedimiento de artrodesis con CIR, en comparación con las artrodesis con tornillos en pacientes con fracturas de tobillo. Asimismo, se incluyó el protocolo de un ECA (ACTRN12617001588381), el cual aún no cuenta con publicación de resultados, y tiene fecha aproximada de finalización en diciembre de 2022 (Tuckett et al. 2019). No se identificaron estudios que evalúen comparativamente al dispositivo CIR, y a la fijación externa en este tipo de 4,1;"147 procedimientos. CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el IETSI no aprueba el uso de clavo intramedular retrógrado para artrodesis en pacientes adultos con fracturas complejas y/o deformidades de la articulación tibia-astrágalo-calcáneo. El equipo evaluador del IETSI, está a la espera de nueva evidencia proveniente de ECA sobre la eficacia y seguridad de la tecnología solicitada. Por otro lado, se recomienda a los especialistas que, de tener conocimiento sobre otras tecnologías sanitarias que puedan representar un beneficio adicional a las tecnologías de uso actual en EsSalud para procedimientos de artrodesis en la población de interés, hagan envío de sus solicitudes para ser valoradas en nuevos documentos de ETS.

[Clinical characteristics and cost-effectiveness of intramedullary nail and plate for the treatment of open tibial fractures].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze clinical characteristics and cost-effectiveness of different final surgical options for treating patients with open tibial fractures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted by enrolling 55 surgically treated patients with open tibial fractures from January 2018 to June 2019. All the patients were categorized in intramedullary nailing (IMN) group and locking compression plate(LCP) group according to the final fixation option. There were 35 cases in group IMN including 27 males and 8 females, aged from 25 to 69 years old with an average of (49.0±10.6) years old. Based on Gustilo-Anderson classification, there were 1 case of typeⅠ, 19 cases of typeⅡand 15 cases of type Ⅲ. There were 20 cases in group LCP including 15 males and 5 females, aged from 46 to 72 years old with an average age of (53.4±14.7) years old. Based on Gustilo-Anderson classification, there were 2 cases of typeⅠ, 11 cases of typeⅡand 7 cases of type Ⅲ. Preoperative waiting time, surgical debridement times, intraoperative bleeding loss, blood and albumin transfusion, operation time, bacterial cultures and complications, bone union time, Johner-Wruhs criteria at 1 year after operation and total cost within 1 year after surgery between two groups were compared. The variables recorded between two groups were statistically analyzed and compared respectively, then the factors affecting hospital costs were evaluated by univariate and multiple linear regression analysis respectively, finally the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: Total 55 patients were enrolled with an average follow-up time of(16.4±7.1) months ranged from 14 to 27 months postoperatively. There were no significantly statistical differences of the demographic materials between the two groups. The intraoperative bleeding loss were(243.18±118.82) ml and (467.86±490.53) ml respectively in group IMN and LCP, the significantly statistical difference was discovered(P<0.05). The surgical duration were(247.50±57.94) min and(350.00±178.77) min respectively in group IMN and LCP, the significantly statistical difference was discovered(P<0.05). There were no significantly statistical differences of the average days before operation, surgical debridement times, received blood and albumin transfusion, wound cultures, complications and bone union time between the two groups(P>0.05). The univariate analysis of the factors affecting the hospital costs indicated that patients with smoke or alcohol (P=0.042), high energy damage (P=0.012), patients with comorbidity diseases(P=0.045), surgical debridement over 2 times (P=0.001), intraoperative bleeding loss over 400 ml (P<0.001), blood and albumin transfusion (P=0.027), wound cultures (P=0.000) and complications (P=0.035) were the factors. The multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated the smoke or alcohol using[ß=-0.256, t=-2.628, 95%CI(-29 667.09, -4 997.47), P=0.014] was the only factor affecting the total cost. The excellent and good rate were 80% and 85% respectively based on the Johner-Wruhs criteria. The average total cost within 1 year after surgery was (136 435.90±39 093.98) CNY in group IMN and (140 034.62±56 821.12) CNY in group LCP. The total surgical duration and total intraoperative bleeding loss were significant lower in group IMN than in group LCP. The average total costs of was significantly higher. The average cost for every 1% of excellent and good rate was 1 705.45 CNY in group IMN and 1 647.46 CNY in group LCP. Each 1% increasing of excellent and good rate cost 719.74 CNY more in group LCP compared with group IMN. CONCLUSION: Both IMN and LCP could provide a satisfactory outcome for open tibial fractures. Meanwhile considering the total cost, patients with smoke or alcohol history, traffic accident, comorbidity diseases, surgical debridement over 2 times, intraoperative bleeding loss over 400 ml, and complications should not be ignored.

Discrimination, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of metric-based assessment of an unstable pertrochanteric 31A2 intramedullary nailing procedure performed by experienced and novice surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Identifying objective performance metrics for surgical training in orthopedic surgery is imperative for effective training and patient safety. The objective of this study was to determine if an internationally agreed, metric-based objective assessment of video recordings of an unstable pertrochanteric 31A2 intramedullary nailing procedure distinguished between the performance of experienced and novice orthopedic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previously agreed procedure metrics (i.e., 15 phases of the procedure, 75 steps, 88 errors, and 28 sentinel errors) for a closed reduction and standard cephalomedullary nail fixation with a single cephalic element of an unstable pertrochanteric 31A2 fracture. Experienced surgeons trained to assess the performance metrics with an interrater reliability (IRR) > 0.8 assessed 14 videos from 10 novice surgeons (orthopaedic residents/trainees) and 20 videos from 14 experienced surgeons (orthopaedic surgeons) blinded to group and procedure order. RESULTS: The mean IRR of procedure assessments was 0.97. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for Procedure Steps, Errors, Sentinel Errors, and Total Errors. A small number of Experienced surgeons made a similar number of Total Errors as the weakest performing Novices. When the scores of each group were divided at the median Total Error score, large differences were observed between the Experienced surgeons who made the fewest errors and the Novices making the most errors (p < 0.001). Experienced surgeons who made the most errors made significantly more than their Experienced peers (p < 0.003) and the best performing Novices (p < 0.001). Error metrics assessed with Area Under the Curve demonstrated good to excellent Sensitivity and Specificity (0.807-0.907). DISCUSSION: Binary performance metrics previously agreed by an international Delphi meeting discriminated between the objectively assessed video-recorded performance of Experienced and Novice orthopedic surgeons when group scores were sub-divided at the median for Total Errors. Error metrics discriminated best and also demonstrated good to excellent Sensitivity and Specificity. Some very experienced surgeons performed similar to the Novice group surgeons that made most errors. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure metrics used in this study reliably distinguish Novice and Experienced orthopaedic surgeons' performance and will underpin quality-assured novice training.

Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators.

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is a very demanding process. For decades, external fixation was the only reliable option for gradual deformity correction. Recently, intramedullary magnetic nails have gained popularity. This research aimed to assess the quality of life in children during gradual deformity correction using intramedullary lengthening nails compared to external fixation. METHOD: Prospective analysis included children who had gradual lower limb deformity correction between 2017 and 2019. Group A included children who had magnetic lengthening nails; patients in group B had external fixation devices. Child health utility 9D (CHU- 9D) and EuroQol 5D youth (EQ- 5D-Y) were used to measure the quality of life at fixed points during the distraction osteogenesis process. The results were used to calculate the utility at each milestone and the overall quality of life adjusted years (QALYs). RESULTS: Thirty-four children were recruited, group A had 16 patients, whilst group B had 18 patients. The average ages were 16.0 years and 14.7 years for groups A and B, respectively. Group A patients reported significantly better utility compared to group B. This was observed during all stages of treatment (P = 0.00016). QALYs were better for group A (0.44) compared to group B (0.34) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The quality of life was generally better in group A compared to group B. In most patients, the health utility progressively improved throughout treatment. In the same way, QALYs were better with the lengthening nails compared to external fixators. The magnetic lengthening devices (PRECICE nails) which were used in this research were recently relabelled to restrict their applications in children; this study was conducted before these restrictions.